COVID-19 Survey III (2022)

Policy, Risks & Response

Section 02

Survey Overview and Demographics

General Overview

Geographic Coverage: United States

Expertise:

  • 65.24 Biology
  • 29.87 Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • 4.87 Biochemistry

Response Overview

Sample Size: 1891

Valid Responses: 164

Response Rate: 9.6

Date initial findings posted: 08.22.22

Most recent update: 08.22.22

Days survey in field: 37

Average response time: 12

Survey Demographics

Respondent Demographics:

  • 56% Female
  • 43.9% Male
  • 100% Academic
  • 0% Industry

Language(s): English

Section Overview

In this third round survey on COVID-19, we asked scientists about the ways in which their professional and personal lives have been impacted over the past year. We also asked their opinions on policy issues related to the pandemic. You can see results from our first survey in 2020 here and our second survey in 2021 here.

Question

Overall, how effectively do you believe the U.S. government has managed the COVID-19 disease pandemic? (N=160)

Finding

More than half of the respondents (55%) reported that the US government has managed COVID-19 pandemic at least somewhat effectively.


Question

Which of the following were initiated at your university (at any point) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic? (N = 158)

Finding

Scientists report that the most common initiatives put in place by universities in response to the pandemic were regular communications about campus COVID-19 policies (95%), free COVID-19 testing (93%) and vaccination (86%).

15% of respondents indicated that universities formally adjusted review standards, and a similar percentage (14%) reported that two-year tenure clock extensions for early career faculty were granted. 3% reported that universities provided financial compensation to cope with the stress and disruptions caused by the pandemic.


Question

Has the leadership of your academic unit (e.g. Chair, Head, Director) discussed any of the following with the faculty during the Spring 2022 semester or term? (N = 157)

Finding

More than half of the respondents (55%) indicate that the leadership of their academic units discussed expectations for being physically present in the workplace during the spring 2022 semester. Slightly more that a quarter of the respondents (28%) reported that ongoing work-life balance challenges were discussed by the leadership of their academic units.


Question

Compared to before the pandemic, are you now going to the campus where you are mainly employed… (N = 160)

Finding

Most of the respondents (57%) indicated that compared to before the pandemic, they are going to campus much less often or a little less often. 5% reported they are going to campus a little more often or much more often as compared to before the pandemic outbreak.


Question

Approximately what percent (%) of your work must be conducted at a physical worksite on the campus where you are mainly employed (e.g. university lab facility)? (N = 160)

Finding

Less than a third of the respondents (30%) indicate that 20% or less of their work must be conducted at a physical worksite on the campus where they are employed. More than a quarter of the respondents (28%) report that more than 60%  of their work must be conducted in person.


Question

Have you moved your home in the last two years? (N = 160)

Finding

Most respondents (86%) did not move in the past two years. Of those who moved, the majority (62%) now live farther from the campus where they are mainly employed.


Question

How far do you live from the campus where you are mainly employed? (N = 160)

Finding

More than three-quarters of the respondents (71%) live less than 10 miles from the campuses where they are employed. Almost a tenth (7%) of the surveyed faculty live 50 or more miles away from their campuses.

Among those who indicated they moved during the pandemic (previous question), 43% currently live more than 50 miles away from the campus they are mainly employed.


Survey Description

This national survey of scientists and engineers was conducted by Center for Science, Technology and Environmental Policy Studies at Arizona State University. The population for the survey represents a random sample of PhD-level faculty in three fields of science. Three fields biology, biochemistry, and civil and environmental engineering,  were collected from 61 randomly selected Carnegie-designated Research Extensive and Intensive (R1) universities in the United States (US). The final sample included contact information for 1,891 scientists. A total of 164 usable responses were obtained, representing an AAPOR response rate (RR4) of 9.06%.

Sample Weighting and Precision: the completed sample was weighted by the inverse of selection probabilities and post-stratified by gender and academic field to represent the population as closely as possible. A conservative measure of sampling error for questions answered by the full sample is plus or minus 5 percentage points. The survey was approved by Institutional Review Boards at Arizona State University and at the University of Illinois at Chicago.